The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the year 2005 and 2006.
The table illustrates the percentage of share of phone companies sale worldwide in two years 2005 and 2006.
Overall, it is clear that, Nokia had dominated all other companies in both the respective years. All the mobile phone manufacturers experienced gradual decrease in share except of Motorola and Sony Ericsson.
With regards to Nokia and Motorola, the percentage of market share in the year 2005 shared about half more than that of Nokia. It accounted as 32.5 and 17.7 respectively. Despite this, Nokia outnumbered all other six companies in both the years. In 2006, Motorola phone saled approximately a fifth. On the other hand, a slide a difference had been seen in percentage of share of Samsung in 2005 and 2006 (12.7 and 11.8).
From the table on scrutinizing the data, others shared highest percentage worldwide among other three manufacturers and namely Sony Ericsson, L.G, BanQ mobile, 19.2% in 2005 and the nearly 3% less than share of a 2005 in 2006. By contrast, except of Sony Ericsson, L.G and BanQ mobile all experienced small decrease in their percent of share from 2005 to 2006. It comprised as 6.7% to 6.3%. 4.9% to 2.4% respectively. While, it noticed 6.3% to 7.4% in case of Sony Ericsson.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | kashyap sahil | 73 | view |
- The diagram showsthe life process of the silkworm and the steps in the manufacturing of silk material 73
- Mobile phones and the internet are very useful for old people However this section of population is the fewer user of mobile phones and the internet In what ways can mobile phones and the internet be useful to the old people How can the old people be enou 61
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 56
- Discuss the reasons why more young people study abroad than in their home country 73
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the year 2005 and 2006 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Overall, it is clear that, Nokia had dominated all other companies in both th...
^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...nufacturers and namely Sony Ericsson, L.G, BanQ mobile, 19.2% in 2005 and the nea...
^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f a 2005 in 2006. By contrast, except of Sony Ericsson, L.G and BanQ mobile all e...
^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...y contrast, except of Sony Ericsson, L.G and BanQ mobile all experienced small d...
^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ease in their percent of share from 2005 to 2006. It comprised as 6.7% to 6.3%. ...
^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hare from 2005 to 2006. It comprised as 6.7% to 6.3%. 4.9% to 2.4% respectively....
^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
....7% to 6.3%. 4.9% to 2.4% respectively. While, it noticed 6.3% to 7.4% in case of So...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hile, it noticed 6.3% to 7.4% in case of Sony Ericsson.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93203883495 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73836324032 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519417475728 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 82.9211472826 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34299299239 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104933662762 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1179476132 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226774138789 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861503683127 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.