Task 1: The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001
The given chart collects and contrasts the percentage of people living per household in Britain over a period of two decades from 1981 to 2001.
Overall, it is obvious that the trend of having less than 2 members in a family has increased significantly over the given time. The four remaining groups made up smaller proportions and underwent corresponding drops, with the 6-person household being the least popular one.
Looking at the bars, families with two people led the chart over the given time length. The year 1981 marked 31% of families with 2 people, which rose by 3% in 2001 (34%). Followed next by the family of 1 person, which also witnessed an upward trend, from 17 percent to 26 percent in 2001,.
In contrast, a contrasting trend can be seen in the remaining four scenarios.Although the 3 members family started with 20% in the former year, they decreased to 17% in 2001. Besides, a decline of 3% was observed in houses with 4 individuals (18% to 15%). In 1981 the proportion of 5-person and 6-person were 8% and 6% respectively. Over the next 20 years, they all went down to 6% and 2%.
- Task 1 The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 78
- Task 2 Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments Give reasons for your answer and include any 85
- Task 2 Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 57
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 2 Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he given chart collects and contrasts the ...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'gave'?
Suggestion: gave
he given chart collects and contrasts the percen...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...be seen in the remaining four scenarios.Although the 3 members family started with 20% i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey decreased to 17% in 2001. Besides, a decline of 3% was observed in houses wit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67452830189 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71269889871 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570754716981 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1161002372 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0909090909 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161335589289 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656148026839 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803173883856 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123078567218 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105233440175 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.