Task 1 Writing - The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over the last year
The depicted graph illustrates the earnings of four distinct cafes, namely The Tea Room, Internet Express, Wi-fi café, Café Cool in New York last year.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the amount of money gained by all cafes mentioned by the graph experienced upward trends, except for the case of The Tea Room. Moreover, it is apparent that Wi-fi café received the highest amount of money at the end of the year.
As can be seen, the Tea Room had the highest amount with 160 million dollars in January. Afterward, this figure increased considerably to nearly 175 million dollars in March after a sharp decrease in February. The following months saw a dramatic fall to approximately 45 million dollars in December. In contrast, Wi-fi café witnessed an enormous rise to nearly 185 million dollars in December from the starting point of roughly 45 million dollars in January.
At the beginning of the year, Internet Express earned exactly 100 million dollars and this figure for Café Cool was just 30 million. Afterward, both cafés experienced a substantial increase during the span.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-11 | Lynh Lynh | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Hau Nguyen | 66 | view |
| 2018-07-05 | Hau Nguyen | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-05 | Hau Nguyen | 11 | view |
- The table illustrates the number of people going to different tourist attractions in Australia during the four-year period from 1996. 78
- Task 1 Writing - The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over the last year 11
- These days, an increasing number of people in many cities know little about their neighbors and do not have a sense of community. What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest? 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 84
- Task 1 writing - Women employed in four countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0597826087 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54625800351 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5062183283 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0610426415915 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249669260993 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480977056871 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0476212912717 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478951785792 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.