The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three pie charts illustrate information about the total spending in several reasons of a school in the United Kingdom in 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Overall, the school spent most of its money for teachers' salaries over three different years. There was an increasing in paying for most of the aspects in between 1981 and 1991, and started to decrease after that until 2001.
In those years, even teachers' salaries were the highest, it rose 10% by 1991, and dropped 5% reaching 45% by 2001. In addition, paying other workers' salaries, and furniture and equipment decreased between 1981 to 1991 and grew back up by 2001. For spending money on resources, it rose up by 1991 and fell down by 2001. Only payment for insurance kept going up in these years, for an approximately 6%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- Nowadays it is possible to use computers and mobile phones for automatic language translation, and there is no need for human translators and interpreters. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views 60
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of young people taking part in different outdoor sports from 1975 to the present day in the South West of England Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 93
- There are many Vietnamese people who claim that we should merge the Solar New Year and the Lunar New Year. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n these years, for an approximately 6%.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 662.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9037037037 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42343383447 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 172.8 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2408803495 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5714285714 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264328408268 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129624082093 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106451445223 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215221021663 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108055885125 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.