The three pie charts below show the changes in aunual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given pie charts reveal the total expenditure of five different amount for a UK school in three year; 1981, 1991, and 2001. The data is calebroted in per cantum, which is clear, and coherent.
It can be seen that the school spending on insurance tiny fraction during the 1981. Apart from that the school spend on the teachers salaries was 40% in 1981. Moreover, the resources were less then fisth in 1981, and 20% in 1991 respectively.
As far as trend was concerned with the salaries of other workers had included more then a quarter during the 1981. In addition to this, the salaries of teachers were 45% in 2001. Furthermore, the spending by school on furniture, and equipment in less then fifth in 1981, and under the quarter during the 2001 respectively.
Overall, it is evident that the spending by school on teachers salaries were increase year to year but the least spending by school on th insurance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 67
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level. 67
- The graph shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 67
- One should only use enough money to fulfill their needs and rest should gives to needy. To what extent you agree and disagree? 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...the total expenditure of five different amount for a UK school in three year; 1981, 19...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...1981. Moreover, the resources were less then fisth in 1981, and 20% in 1991 respecti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...1981, and 20% in 1991 respectively. As far as trend was concerned with the sal...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ries of other workers had included more then a quarter during the 1981. In addition ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ool on furniture, and equipment in less then fifth in 1981, and under the quarter du...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54459445443 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2508765309 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7777777778 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312443093187 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127251397619 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973342723575 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191892008372 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626618703203 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.