The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.
The given two figures indicate the proportion of crime commitment among male and female of dissimilar ages in the UK and that of men and women prison inmates in the prison system of this nation.
It is evident from the graph that 20-year-old inhabitants have a proclivity to offend the laws. Additionally, the pie chart illustrates that men tend to receive prison punishment.
Regarding the pie chart, the share of male prison inmates accounts for the highest proportion of the chart, at 96%. Meanwhile, the figure for female is dwarfed by that of men, at 4%.
In terms of the graph, the proportion of male criminals aged 20 is the peak of the graph, at 16%, which outnumbers that of female approximately by four to one, at 4.5%. Conversely, 2% and 0% of male and female who are at the aged of 10 are convicted respectively, whereas the rates of adolescents breaking the laws in both genders are below 8%. At the same time, the percentages of male aged 20-45 and 45-60 range from 8% to 16% and from 8% to 2% in turn, compared to 4% of female offenders aged 25-30. In addition, the share of 30-60-year-old women committing infringements is below 4%.
- The table below gives information on the salaries paid for secondary highschool teachers in 5 countries 67
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 56
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n committing infringements is below 4%.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6568627451 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83377430587 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7759856272 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404691614599 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157279958519 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142909003814 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253194179349 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171058634491 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.