The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The maps compare an island of 100 meters before and after establishing many tourist facilities.
In general, the most significant change is the construction of more tourist accommodation. However, the green area on the island remains unchanged.
Beforehand, no facilities were built on the island and only consisted of terrain and trees. After the establishment, cottages were added surrounding the palm trees as tourist lodges, along with the footpath around them. A restaurant and reception were constructed in the middle of the cottage, surrounded by a road for vehicles linked to the foot pathways of cottages.
In addition, it can be seen that massive changes were also witnessed on the sea shore; a dock was built for ships to settle. The western part of the island is also set up as a swimming area by the beach. However, no trees are being cut down, and empty land is still found in the eastern part of the island.
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or Disagree 61
- Some people think school should groups pupils according to their academic ability but others believe pupils with different abilities should be educated together Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and what ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 61
- Many people in the music business feel that illegal music sites on the internet are a serious threat to the industry and more should be done to prevent them from operating To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 62
- Household
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding footpath'?
Suggestion: the surrounding footpath
...alm trees as tourist lodges, along with the footpath around them. A restaurant and reception were constr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, as to, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94904458599 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80912661524 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636942675159 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.300729934 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236847876974 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924480397236 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921241374559 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158948088743 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107811800658 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding footpath'?
Suggestion: the surrounding footpath
...alm trees as tourist lodges, along with the footpath around them. A restaurant and reception were constr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, as to, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94904458599 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80912661524 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636942675159 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.300729934 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236847876974 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924480397236 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921241374559 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158948088743 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107811800658 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.