The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to city hospital; in 2007 and in 2010.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps illustrate road access related to a city hospital change considerably in its form in 2007 and in 2010.
It is obvious that, the city hospital in 2010 expanded bus station in the western side that allow more space and accessibility to Hospital Rd. The ring road has two entire gage in 2010.
As can be seen, size of the city hospital has not change in 2007 and in 2010, while add two roundabout in entire and end of hospital Rd which joint to bus station located next to it. A public car park located close to the city hospital that has own entry in the east of ring road in 2010. Another entry is for staff car park. These two staff car park and public car park separated with each own entry in 2010. By 2010 there were six bus stop that removed.
As a result, the new city hospital has more facilities with better road accessibility.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-15 dorae 67 view
2024-07-15 dorae 67 view
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 73 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 78 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gage' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'gages'.
Suggestion: gages
...spital Rd. The ring road has two entire gage in 2010. As can be seen, size of the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'changed'.
Suggestion: changed
...seen, size of the city hospital has not change in 2007 and in 2010, while add two roun...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'stop' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'stops'.
Suggestion: stops
...try in 2010. By 2010 there were six bus stop that removed. As a result, the new ci...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 693.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.33125 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26707927464 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51875 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0022535569 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.625 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272607586032 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132758660806 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957346222856 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203102671576 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075597757827 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.4 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.