The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
The histogram illustrates how the proportion of residents rented and owned accommodation in England and Wales during the period from 1918 to 2001. Overall, in the beginning, the percentage of owned accommodation was at a lower level than the rented share. but, in the end, rented accommodation was surpassed by owned accommodation.
Focusing on the detail, households owned accommodation only occupied approximately 23% in 1918. After a sharp jump, it remained at 30% in 1939 and 1953. Following this, the percentage of owned accommodation experienced a significant increase and finally reached almost 70%. but there was a slight decrease of about 5 per cent between 2001 and 2011.
By contrast, households in rented accommodation accounted for almost 80% of households, while the proportion sustained at about 69% from 1939 to 1953, it has declined constantly and was caught up by owned accommodation in 1971. Eventually, in 2001, it hit rock bottom, which is approximately 31%. Since then, the percentage of owned accommodation had rebounded slightly and reached 36% in 2011.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 11
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rentedaccommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...at a lower level than the rented share. but, in the end, rented accommodation was s...
^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ncrease and finally reached almost 70%. but there was a slight decrease of about 5 ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28772488936 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5062101204 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.