The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012
The diagrams depict the transformation of a school campus during the period from 1985 to 2012.
Overall, it seems evident that the landscape in 2012 has more infrastructures than in 1985 due to the enormous increase in the number of students, from 1500 to 2300.
In 1985, The school campus has few structures. In the south of the campus, there was a huge playing field that dominated the entire area. Meanwhile, A big car park was linked to the playing field, which is next to an office building on the east side of the map. A library was located in the south of the office. On the west side, there was a 2 storeys classroom block, which was opposite a smaller car park.
By 2012, considerable changes had occurred on the campus as the number of buildings had increased. The smaller car park was demolished for trees and plants, while the library was converted to a computer room to store resources. Not only the bis car park was modernized to a semicircle shape, but also two buildings namely the swimming pool and fitness club were built on the east side of the playing field. Lastly, the number of classrooms was increased to 3, while the old one was refurbished into 3 storeys.
- Some people think environment problems are too big for individuals to solve Others however think that those problems cannot be solved unless individuals take some action Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Full time university students need to spend a lot of time on studying but it is essential to get involved other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- nowadays museums have become more and more important What are the purposes of places such as museums and how should they be funded 56
- The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 33
- More and more companies are allowing employee to work at home Do you think it is a positive or negative problem 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, lastly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58962264151 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61184062744 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570754716981 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1821345695 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220454637254 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100779650188 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121182075917 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172277690379 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110968461265 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.