The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2015, and future projections for 2005

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2015, and future projections for 2005

The bar chart provides information about the income of Southland from it's main exports in 2000 , 2015 , and 2025

Overall, what stands out from the chart is that in 2000 international tourism was the most profitable export, which was replaced by Dairy products in 2015 . It is projected that International tourism will be the dominant export.

Looking at the details, the indicators of International tourism was the highest in comparison with the other exports, at 8 billion in 2000. However, the least profitable export was meat products. Regarding the year of 2015 , Dairy product was on the top of the list, at 10, just ahead of international tourism , with 9. According to the projections for future, international tourism will turn into dominant export by reaching 10 , in 2025. In addition, the indicators of Dairy products are expected to decrease slightly. Meat products will continue to fall from 5 to 4 in this year

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-12 Jony view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Southland from its main exports in 2000 , 2015 , and 2025 Overall, what stands...
^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...and from its main exports in 2000 , 2015 , and 2025 Overall, what stands out fr...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h was replaced by Dairy products in 2015 . It is projected that International tour...
^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eat products. Regarding the year of 2015 , Dairy product was on the top of the lis...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 10, just ahead of international tourism , with 9. According to the projections fo...
^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...turn into dominant export by reaching 10 , in 2025. In addition, the indicators of...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 5.05154639175 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 937.175257732 82% => OK
No of words: 153.0 206.0 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0522875817 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9335830611 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.0 290.88556701 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2295959145 44.8134815571 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 76.5299724578 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 4.34317383033 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212152565573 0.216113520407 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818914506947 0.0766984524023 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950227999475 0.0603063233224 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207796881427 0.12726935374 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128419523662 0.0580467560999 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 8.37731958763 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 41.2886597938 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.