Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? what is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion?
It is common in every organisation to conduct an interview in order to select a better candidate for their company. From over many decades this approach is the best way to appoint an employee, however, providing internships could also be the better option. In my opinion, employee should be selected after completing two tasks, first conducting an interview at very basic level and second to provide live training and test at the end of the training.
With the unprecedented development in field of science and technology, employment opportunities has increased. The basic procedure to appoint a candidate for the company is to conduct an interview and decide the best fit for their company. However, I believe, one hour of interview cannot decide all the skills and talents candidate have. Although cracking interview to entered the organisation is compulsory, employers should provide a basic training to the candidates about their work.
Internship could be the best solution in order to select best employee. Since employee will get on-the-job training they can be easily assessed by the employer by observing their quality of work, management skills, communication skills and team work. At last, an examination of all the candidates should be conduct who are selected for the job so that decision could become more easier and practical. Moreover, employees will gain experience of work field and understanding of organisation environment.
In conclusion, interview is the best method to assessed the participants for the role, however, providing proper practical training in the respective work field and than assessing the participants will give the best employee for their organisation.
- There is a public event coming up in your town Write a letter to your friend who you think would be interested to take part in it in your letter Describe the event say why you think he she would be interested suggest an arrangement to meet there with him 73
- Write a letter to a friend telling them about an interesting website you found Tell your friend How you found it How it can help How you use it 100
- Giving children and adolescents pocket money is common throughout the world Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this practice and give your own opinion 85
- Some educational systems make students study specialised subjects from the age of fifteen while others require students to study a wide range Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- Some feel that countries should produce most of the food that is eaten in their country and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...r the job so that decision could become more easier and practical. Moreover, employees will...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...aining in the respective work field and than assessing the participants will give th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 32.9175257732 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.85567010309 337% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 937.175257732 153% => OK
No of words: 265.0 206.0 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42641509434 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03097571959 2.54303337028 119% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 127.690721649 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532075471698 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 290.88556701 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3473450037 44.8134815571 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.833333333 76.5299724578 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 16.8248392259 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 4.34317383033 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148804085764 0.216113520407 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612527705199 0.0766984524023 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351196238222 0.0603063233224 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101254585542 0.12726935374 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015269856136 0.0580467560999 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 8.37731958763 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 70.7449484536 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 7.45979381443 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 8.71597938144 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 41.2886597938 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.