Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?

Essay topics:

Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?

At the time when famines heavily strike impoverished third world countries, many people living in wealthy countries waste tremendous amounts of food daily. In my opinion, understanding the probable reasons for this phenomenon is important and may lead us to some applicable solutions that will result in reducing food waste.
The low cost of food seems to be one of the obvious reasons, exacerbating the problem. Due to the revolutionary technological achievements, people have increased both the quality and the quantity of their crops. In turn, according to the laws of supply and demand, the prices of the crops have immensely dropped. A recent study of the FAO stated that the global crops prices have dropped 50 percent over the last decade. This enabled people to buy excessive amounts of food without a real need.
Furthermore, the absence of strict regulations to discourage or punish this attitude can also be considered a major cause. Not everyone is aware that wasting food may create problems. Consequently, they are likely to resist any calls for controlling the consumption of dietary supplies unless they are forced by the power of law. Several countries in the world saw a drop in their national food waste after implementing a ban on the excessive purchasing of food.
Fortunately, there are some possible approaches that can be adopted by both people and governments. Firstly, raising the awareness of this issue is immensely important. Using social media platforms can draw public attention to the potential dangers of food waste and how communities can confront it. Secondly, enforcing laws that prohibit the wasting of food by people and companies will deter such harmful practice.
In conclusion, the decreased price of food as well as lack of regulations allowed the unfortunate trend of throwing away food to continue. I believe that creating awareness and legislation are parts of a straightforward solution to this issue.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-27 drabouyousif 84 view
Essays by user drabouyousif :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, third, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 32.9175257732 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 937.175257732 175% => OK
No of words: 314.0 206.0 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22292993631 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93915746401 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 127.690721649 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 290.88556701 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6468253959 44.8134815571 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4705882353 76.5299724578 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 16.8248392259 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 4.34317383033 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 1.49484536082 736% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354601076004 0.216113520407 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103749025086 0.0766984524023 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777124813002 0.0603063233224 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189847375452 0.12726935374 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411804732344 0.0580467560999 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 8.37731958763 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 8.71597938144 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 7.59969072165 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 41.2886597938 230% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.