Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters Do u support it or not Agree Disagree

Essay topics:

Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)

Today, Youth and Teenager are impressed by famous film stars and gleaming sports personal. I think youngsters should not admire and see those personalities as their role model. Because many of them are involved in major criminal or bad act in their fields. Although we cannot take them as our role model.

Firstly, There are several news regarding sportsman when they are involved in drug taking scandal and by these kind of act. Youth are admire from the shinning world of glamour but the bitter truth is so petrified. For example: Their were some news regarding a cricketer which in involved in spot fixing and take drug. That person was huge embarrassment to the whole society.

In addition to my previous statement, Several film stars are caught in this kind of act to but the most outrageous thing is that film star influence youth mostly because they show a dream. A Dream to become successful or being bad. An Indian actor name Sanjay Dutt plays several role as a gangster or Don who lives luxurious and ravishing life. This kind of actor promote crime and other criminal acts which is adopt by the youth and we can see in our streets. How much crime is increasing day by day.

In my opinion, Film Stars and Sports person are not perfect human being and somehow they promote crime and other bad activities to the youth. So by outlining my previous statement I disagree with the statement that Stars and Sportsmen can become role model for youngster.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-05-02 abhinavcreed13 77 view
2018-01-21 Pratik_93 55 view
2017-10-02 Zeemakay 84 view
2018-06-25 Davi kaur 88 view
2018-12-26 Zain Ali Khan 11 view
Essays by user saad_mahmoodkhan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some news'.
Suggestion: some news
...s our role model. Firstly, There are several news regarding sportsman when they are invol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sportsmen'?
Suggestion: sportsmen
...rstly, There are several news regarding sportsman when they are involved in drug taking s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... involved in drug taking scandal and by these kind of act. Youth are admire from the shinn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'admired'.
Suggestion: admired
...dal and by these kind of act. Youth are admire from the shinning world of glamour but ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun role seems to be countable; consider using: 'several roles'.
Suggestion: several roles
... An Indian actor name Sanjay Dutt plays several role as a gangster or Don who lives luxuriou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'adopted'.
Suggestion: adopted
... crime and other criminal acts which is adopt by the youth and we can see in our stre...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, for example, i think, in addition, kind of, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 5.05154639175 337% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 937.175257732 129% => OK
No of words: 255.0 206.0 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74901960784 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39390485798 2.54303337028 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 127.690721649 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 290.88556701 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.360824742268 277% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5987654129 44.8134815571 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7333333333 76.5299724578 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 16.8248392259 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 4.34317383033 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.49484536082 669% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226864165216 0.216113520407 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690293769658 0.0766984524023 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754989703188 0.0603063233224 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146381626389 0.12726935374 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887923643107 0.0580467560999 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 8.37731958763 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 70.7449484536 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 8.71597938144 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 41.2886597938 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.