According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world-wide, we should be concern about the effect this is having on social interaction
There is no doubt that the Internet has made communication extremely easy and possibly holds new ways of communication. However, a new research has shown that the constant use of the Internet has lead to poor interaction among people. In my opinion, overuse of the Internet is a major cause of concern as it has led to poor virtual communication with people around. But, a balance can be reach to prevent it's negative impact.
To begin, one of the major benefit of the Internet is the accessibility to people wherever they are. This means people can easily pass messages across to others in a fast and convenient way. Also, the Internet help to connect people regardless of where they live. This means families are well connected that before. For example, I am able to get in touch with my sibling living in the UK by just a click away using a social media platform. They get my message instantly and sometime I can use a video call to actually see them. As a result, Family ties are kept strong and people are well connected.
Although, the ability of the Internet to keep people connected is like a double edge sword. This means when people over indulge in it, they become withdrawn and are less likely to form meaningful human interaction. This is true especially for children, who at a tender age begin to use the Internet. For instance, a recent study showed that children who spend over 4 hours a day on the web are likely to develop one or more mental health problems. Consequently, people tend to be less sensitive and suffer from more mental issues.
To sum up, communication using the Internet has been amazingly useful to humans. However, a balance should be maintained to keep a healthy social life.
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 41
- According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world-wide, we should be concer 56
- Some people feel that entertainers such as filmt stars, pop music and or sport stars are paid too much moneyDo you agree or disagree 11
- According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world-wide, we should be concer 78
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss both advantages and disadvantages 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new research'.
Suggestion: new research
...lds new ways of communication. However, a new research has shown that the constant use of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n touch with my sibling living in the UK by just a click away using a social medi...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...trong and people are well connected. Although, the ability of the Internet to keep pe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70529801325 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.648172468 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579470198675 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8585898043 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.9444444444 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327831981479 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958441416353 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505531851078 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189833135137 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185747197218 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.