With the advancement in technology, the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased. Some people believe that there will be no role for teachers in the classroom.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people nowadays think that the number of computers being used in the advanced area of education is significantly increasing, heralding teacher obsolescence. Personally, I am convinced that teachers still play a crucial role that robots cannot replace, owing to the tutor's assistance in students' learning and other factors.
To begin with, in the advanced technology era, robots undoubtedly assist instructors and students in a variety of ways. They can effectively educate pupils in all aspects of the curriculum, especially mathematics since they have been programmed to calculate and accurately transmit information and information to students. They cannot, however, completely replace teachers in a variety of human concerns. For instance, students encounter problems that cannot be resolved by robots, including those linked to psychology, school costs, and even families. Teachers, in my opinion, can assist them by lowering their tuition, confiding in each other, or even paying a visit to their homes, which machines cannot do.
Secondly, robots can facilitate personalized learning by studying online. Many digital learning tools, such as Azota or Shub Classroom, are now available to rate children's performance on assignments and determine their exact capabilities. The issue might not be beyond the teachers' control since it might require so much time and effort, especially in crowded classrooms. However, computer-based learning appears to be ideal and appropriate for self-disciplined and motivated students, while other items, particularly mobile devices, may easily distract those who lack these traits. Therefore, they still require a teacher’s supervision and observation to oversee their studies.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the use of computers in education has expanded in the age of modern technology and may eventually supplant instructors. However, they continue to be extremely important in supporting kids' learning and a variety of other human problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | linh allie | 78 | view |
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 78
- Task 2 Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain Others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers 78
- In many countries nowadays consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Many people think that bottled water should be banned Do you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...hat robots cannot replace, owing to the tutors assistance in students learning and oth...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79661016949 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11607484443 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637288135593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5539543677 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216410325639 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695362262552 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680457642619 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139537881919 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491272357567 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.