advertisement
In modern time, a huge amount of advertising is targeted at very young children. Individuals believe that this can have detrimental influences on children and should be prohibited. To a certain extent, I agree with this view, while I also believe that there are far more arguments to disagree with it.
On the one hand, this opinion seems to be unreasonable simply because children would be impaired performance about many positive businesses which sell the product for children without these advertisements. In evidence, several useful information in the product would become less available to children because the business can not run advertisements with the band of the government. Thus, banning advertisements would not only reduce sales of the companies but also lead them into a loss for the long term.
In spite of the arguments above, I also support this view for the following reasons. To commence with the misuse of business, people would misuse advertisements to sell the product for children who do not have sufficient awareness about spending. Take an example, in my country, where many Youtubers produce a wide range of funny video to attract children to buy their products. Therefore, Running advertisements could access to more children sell more product children although these products could not be suitable for children. Equally important is that few advertisements would influence children's aspect of life. To illustrate, unhealthy food and drinks usually targeted children who do not care about their health. Consequently, If the children consume more harmful food, they would suffer from more health problems such as obesity, disease or diabetes.
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to reject this view, there are also persuasive reasons to believe that this idea is reasonable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-28 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...cts could not be suitable for children. Equally important is that few advertisements wo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93139646524 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587412587413 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7608268178 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173672843473 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793861306624 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953885877478 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103023584347 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622632584675 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.