Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is undeniable that advertisements these days are becoming more and more prevalent compared to the past. From my perspective, this prominence of current advertising will exert pressure on both customers and enterprises.
Concerning companies, it is plausible that advertisements could result in low profits. This is because a company might have a tendency to mount a plethora of merchandise advertising campaigns to gain market shares from other competitors, which, in turn, drives additional expenses for advertising to soar. For instance, it is a must for a company to squander capital investments on new products advertisement on television or other online platforms. As a result, if a company allocates excessive its budget on advertising without balancing advertisement fees and product prices, plummeting revenue might be unavoidable, which lowers the company’s year-on-year profits.
Regarding customers, what advertisements could cause to customers are aggressive emotions and lack of beliefs in products. First and foremost, modern advertisements are inclined to irritate customers too frequently. Take an hour television show as a prime example, high density of commercial pop-ups within an hour show tends to drive people crazy even though they are not into those advertised products and therefore saying impolite words might unintentionally occur at times. In tandem with this, advertisements might also lead to a decrease in consumers’ beliefs. This is because brand-new merchandise tends to be advertised far beyond its real quality, which contributes to a fall on the number of customers as consumers fail to trust in products’ images.
In conclusion, the popularity of advertisements might be inherent in modern society for the upcoming years due to the strict competitiveness among companies. It is my firm conviction that this prevalence of current advertising will have negative impacts on both customers and enterprises in light of the interpretations above.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
- Research indicates that nowadays some consumers are much less influenced by advertising than in the past What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any releva 93
- In many countries there is not enough recycling for waste materials e g paper can glass What are the reasons of this situation What can be done to encourage recycling 61
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about the news However others believe that they can learn the news more effectively through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays going internationally to learn has become a choice that a lot of students prefer Why What is its impact 61
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
... to squander capital investments on new products advertisement on television or other on...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70469798658 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40995741295 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9440813101 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.769230769 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157410185498 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065973753461 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740767791405 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114360758715 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701492848149 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.