Because of modern technology it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give our opinion

Essay topics:

Because of modern technology, it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give our opinion

In today’s world, most countries have shown great concern about practised skills in daily life. When this issue comes into views, there exist many conflicting opinions. Some people share the view that due to the emergence of modern technologies, there is no need to learn handwriting skills. Meanwhile, others are of the view that this type of skill is important. Both of the views have their own merits which require careful consideration.

To begin with, some people advocate that skills regarding modern technologies can help us save the time used for handwriting skills. This is shown by the following example. The fact is that 95% of texts will be read within 3 minutes of being sent, with the average responding time for a text being a mere 90 seconds. While using handwriting skill for this purpose such as using letters can take several hours even, several days to receive and reply, which is relatively time-consuming. Therefore, it is obvious that keyboarding or other skills related to modern technology is more essential than handwriting skills in this day and age.

On the other hand, sticking with a pen and paper has some serious benefits. In fact, writing by hand appears to improve our ability to remember things, meaning even in today’s tech-obsessed society, the pen just might be mightier than Words app. In reality, studies in this field conducted by University of Melbourne’s Science showed that in a lecture people cannot possibly write everything heard, they have to write in a style that allows them to maximize information from minimum output. That means the brain has to select suitable information actively, which can boost memory. Meanwhile, using Words, people tend to type everything they heard from the speaker without choosing. As this example shows, in some specific cases, handwriting skills are better than skills relying on modern technology.

Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that both writing by hand or writing by using technology can bring many particular benefits. However, from my perspective, handwriting is more integrated compared to technology because of its memory encouragement

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-11 Guiseppe59192 89 view
2023-06-11 Guiseppe59192 73 view
2020-11-16 lhm.ils 89 view
2020-10-01 lhm.ils 89 view
2020-04-05 lanthanh 67 view
Essays by user lhm.ils :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to handwrite'.
Suggestion: to handwrite
...technologies, there is no need to learn handwriting skills. Meanwhile, others are of the vi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which require careful consideration. To begin with, some people advocate that...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndwriting skills in this day and age. On the other hand, sticking with a pen a...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... skills relying on modern technology. Given the aforementioned points, it may ...
^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logy because of its memory encouragement
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, as to, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26011560694 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79975918164 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1418924598 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283071558345 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883170413152 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867377506208 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167332664955 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582418422103 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.