Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?
It is sometimes argued that a huge amount of money is wasted on protecting animals and their living areas by people, which could be used more effectively on tackling serious problems. I completely disagree with this notion and I therefore believe that they should continue to be conserved.
To begin with, preserving species is beneficial to a certain extent. On the individuals’ level, protecting animals and their habitat gives them opportunities to stay in nature. As a result, more and more people have a tendency to participate in animal rescue organizations, which not only helps these species but also plays a vital role in improving our live’s quality. On the society’s level, a country’s economy could not develop without the contribution of creatures. Australia, for instance, which is famous for Kangaroo and other species, attracts millions of visitors every year due to the diversity of their creatures and environment.
In addition, other problematic issues could not be solved just by transferring the amount of money from animals’ protection.The main reason is that the budget for maintaining the diversity of the environment only accounts for a minority of total spending. Meanwhile, the amount of money for tackling poverty and health care is much higher, which can not be fulfilled by adding species conservation budget.Furthermore , totally forgetting about securing creatures may take a heavy toll on numerous aspects. Many dangerous diseases will appear if their natural predators become extinct, putting a strain on the government's responsibility regarding poor and citizens’ health.
In conclusion, while some maintain that the money for securing animals and their habitat should be replaced due to its unnecessary, I believe that it is better to conserve them.
- H
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or negative development 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- H
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...mount of money from animals’ protection.The main reason is that the budget for main...
^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...d by adding species conservation budget.Furthermore , totally forgetting about securing cre...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... species conservation budget.Furthermore , totally forgetting about securing creat...
^^
Line 5, column 610, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...become extinct, putting a strain on the governments responsibility regarding poor and citiz...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48745519713 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14175102288 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616487455197 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7153173017 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.181818182 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1818181818 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28118249846 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980730249073 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538262337426 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166085017496 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299452076139 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.