Parents and classmates both have profound contributions to a student’s success. But comparing with classmates, parents play far more important role in achieving success in school for students. I opine that parents prepare their offspring in a better manner than peer students. The following reasons could explain why.
First and foremost, there is not a single shred of doubt that parents are the emissary of light in everyone’s life. They can ignite potentials of an individual. They can instill moral values in children. Eventually, this encourages children to be attentive in their study. Which, by consequence, helps children to be successful in school.
Secondly, parents can explicitly boost their children’s performance. They can impart several organizational skills that are crucial for students’ success. Learning and acquiring proficiency in competence of getting organized and staying focused help students in almost everything they do, particularly in school performance. But these skills are not usually taught by peers, so children can benefit from some parental instructions with time-management skills and organization. That is to say, parents can teach them how to keep the projects and class assignment together in folders, binders, or notebooks that are organized by subjects. They can also teach them how to make plan and meet deadlines. These skills contribute to the performance substantially.
Thirdly, parents are the most important mentor for a child and they know better their children than others. Thereby, they can explain a concept in details without unnecessary complexities. In addition to this, they can look over their offspring’s study materials and can make mock quizzes as they study for forthcoming exams. As a result, children can do better in the real examinations.
All things considered, it seems reasonable to assume that parents have more influence than peers on children’s performance in school. This is because they have some vantage points that are impossible for classmates.
- Children today are dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and joining in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- Children today are dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and joining in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors do you agree or disagree with this view 61
- Children today are dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and joining in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors do you agree or disagree with this view 67
- Some people think that boys and girls should be educated in the same schools Others however believe that girls achieves better results when educated in single sex school Discuss both these views and give your oipnion 78
- Children today are dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and joining in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors do you agree or disagree with this view 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, in addition, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61290322581 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1008709461 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583870967742 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1613581545 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0909090909 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0909090909 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204776244268 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618113312717 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654877312284 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132548782583 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677661494603 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.