Computers translate language very quickly. Learning language is wastage of time. Do you agree or diagree

Essay topics:

Computers translate language very quickly. Learning language is wastage of time. Do you agree or diagree

It is an incontrovertible fact that technical gadgets disperse every nook of the world. The given topic asserts that today being a multilingual has not important for people due to computer translate every language in few seconds. This essay vehemently disagree with this notion and rendered my view points in the upcoming paragraphs.

To embark with their plethora of reasons why learning a foreign language has beneficial for people. The first is that today people have become a part of globalisation to achieve good position or job in multinational companies, masses should have knowledge about at least one foreign language. In that time, they cannot use the computer for translating any language. Secondly, if they know another language, it will helpful to enhance their knowledge and creativity. For example, they can travel more in another nations and can communicate with natives in their language. In this way, they can know about the culture, tradition and history which will help to increase the level of knowledge.

To continue with my viewpoints, people cannot carry the computer for translating everywhere. As well as, it cannot transfer the idioms and some slangs of any specific language. Moreover, a survey has conducted that the old age people mind has not able to learn new things. However, if the people have learnt the foreign language in their young age their mind cell has not been died in old age and they can learn everything in this age.

In conclusion, to transfer the language with the help of computer is a temporary method. So, to learn any phone language have numerous of benefit to people such as better career, knowledge, good communication skills and so on.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-12 Motu 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...he given topic asserts that today being a multilingual has not important for people due to com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09285714286 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75147455829 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.859831903 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157780526326 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599760989618 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633372144757 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109435365788 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350921351687 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.