Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It can be clearly seen that people are being able to purchase the same commodities regardless of place due to the globalization. It seems that there are no borders between countries. From my point of view, this have both benefits and drawbacks because of these following reasons.
Regarding to the advantage, it brings convenience to people. In the past, when people wanted to buy something, they had to travel long trips, not to mention that the goods are only made in foreign countries because products were not available anywhere and it caused physical and mental stress or even life risk. Since countries began to cooperate and share to develop so that the commodity market expanded, people have been able to bought every product without having to go as far as before. This help people save a lot of money and time.
However, it has a major drawback which is a terrible effect on environment. The development of the international market depends on the export needs as well as import, which fulfilled by the 3 main transportation routes are road, sea and air using fuel mainly gasoline and oil, that releases greenhouse gases into the environment and causes pollution. Futhermore, in parallel with the expansion of production and business activities of multinational corporation, more and more factories were built. In fact, these enterprises do not invest to much money on waste treatment technology in host country and it lead to causing severe damage to the environment such as the case of Vedan company, a Taiwanese FDI enterprise in Vietnam, which discharges 10 times more than the permitted standard directly into the Thi Vai River.
To sum up, it is obvious that globalization brings resemblance between countries in the sale of goods and it has both advantages and disadvantages. Governments need to take measures to maximize benefits and minimize drawbacks, especially environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of people in the United Kingdom per age group without any qualifications
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...n fact, these enterprises do not invest to much money on waste treatment technolog...
^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...tment technology in host country and it lead to causing severe damage to the environ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, well, in fact, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14147909968 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94964862337 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64308681672 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.150892868 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233260482834 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602390920157 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539123176781 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109761870673 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618963674198 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...n fact, these enterprises do not invest to much money on waste treatment technolog...
^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...tment technology in host country and it lead to causing severe damage to the environ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, well, in fact, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14147909968 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94964862337 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64308681672 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.150892868 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233260482834 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602390920157 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539123176781 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109761870673 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618963674198 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.