The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The bar charts give information about what graduate and post-graduate students did after leaving college if they did not do full-time work. The data was collected in the UK in 2008. Overall, most of the graduates and postgraduates in the UK did further study after leaving college while there were not many students doing voluntary work.
It can be easily seen that further study was done by far more graduates when finished in college, about nearly 30,000 students, which was nearly 10 times higher than those choosing the voluntary work. Following that, 17,735 students did part-time jobs and about 16,000 students were unemployed.
Similarly, most of the postgraduates did further study and a few of them chose voluntary work, about 2,725 students and 345 students, respectively. While the data gap between doing part-time work and being unemployed in graduate students was not large, that of postgraduates was huge. The number of students who did part-time work was 1.5 times higher than that of unemployed students.
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 84
- Write about the following topic.Some people decide to start their own business instead of working for a company or organisation. Do the advantages for people working for their own business outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and includ 89
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21212121212 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70566524649 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7435400365 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423749911583 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21314365272 0.103423049105 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134377906377 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315455042203 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174551953823 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.