Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
People have a different view about the impact of globalisation on people life. While there is a persuasive argument in favour of global trade, I would argue that it has several drawbacks.
On the on hand, some people believe that globalisation is highly beneficial to both individuals and governments. From their point of view, an outstanding positive aspect perhaps is the possibility of buying the same product in all over the world, whereby it leads to customers to be assured of goods quality. For example, some world brands and shops such as Nike, Adidas, McDonald's can be easily found on upscale streets in different countries and cities. Therefore, people can purchase same goods as they have been found in their home country when they are deprived of their home country. They also mentioned that it compels compony to boost the quality of their products because the world trade are increasingly competitive and so if a company wants to enter the foreign market, it should comply with international standards.
On the other hand, I believe that buying same products has several dire consequences. To begin with, it contributes to tradition loss, where indigenous people, especially the youth assimilate and embrace the other nations culture, abandoning their heritage. As we can see in Vietnam which the traditional clothes replaced with jeans and T-shirt. Furthermore, globalisation may cause countless local compony to be at risk of bankruptcy. Since they find it difficult to compete with the big overseas company which employs numerous gimmicks to channels shopper choice, stemming from a lack of finance and generating significant revenue to devote to advertisements.
In conclusion, whereas purchasing unique products has some individualised benefits, I believe that drawbacks overshadow its advantages. As a result of destroying cultural diversity and damage the domestic companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | milu_123 | 22 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | yazhtut | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Billynguyen1225 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 84
- There has been a dramatic growth in the number of people studying at universities in the last few decades. While some people see this as a positive trend which raises the general level of education within the community, others fear that it is lowering the 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42424242424 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99143801201 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1542062013 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132117390471 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412813936299 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437740911169 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649384063584 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490776053762 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.