Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, the undeniable truth has presented that with the rise in competition there is gradual rise in working hours in every country. However, many people wrongly believe that a long average working time is directly tied to a nation's economic prosperity. Whereas working overtime is more likely to negatively impact on economic progress. This essay provides some empirical evidences to support this.
To begin with, lengthening the duration of hours per employee is not necessarily improve the productivity rate of labor. Substantial scientific evidence demonstrated that extended work schedules adversely affect the health and well-being of workers. To enumerate people work long hours are vulnerable to illness, including fatigue, work stress and depression, thus, decline their performance. Accordingly, the rate of sick leave is likely to increase, in a long run, which is regarded as a cost which would hold back the economic success. Hence, a long average working time is associated with diminished output.
On the other hand, instead of increasing working hours, some essential factors of driving a successful economy have incredibly improved productivity along with reducing working hours of employees. Firstly, technological innovation, which proves a nation's ability to create and exploit knowledge, has become a major source of competitive advantage and wealth creation. The innovative technology, such as computer and smart phone, have helped to increase performance in producing goods, facilitated communication and enabled more extensive networking and cooperation among firms. Apart from that, highly educated and well-trained workers are vitally important to improve the productivity of competently operating industries.
In conclusion, a long average working time of a country is not proportional to its economic success but there are some factors like technological development which results to startling growth of a country’s economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-02 | ALI SAQLAIN ZAHID | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Faramarz Abbasi | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | tix2304 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | quanchua | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Meet2607 | 61 | view |
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news Would it be better if more good news were reported Use your own ideas knowledge and exper 89
- More and more people work at home and study at home with the development of computer technology. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 78
- The supporters of genetic research claim that genetic engineering is the answer to many problems and it should be conducted and results should be rigorously applied Is it true that genetic research has more benefits compared to drawbacks 73
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give opinions 89
- Some people believe that teenagers should always follow the examples of older people and some believe it is natural in teenagers to challenge what old people say Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...verage working time is directly tied to a nations economic prosperity. Whereas working ov...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... tied to a nations economic prosperity. Whereas working overtime is more likely to nega...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...echnological innovation, which proves a nations ability to create and exploit knowledge...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, whereas, apart from, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83103448276 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0980048046 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6196617013 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.785714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361824554209 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116402071116 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105072229162 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230010556185 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840343227241 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.