Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?

Essay topics:

Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?

Nowadays, more and more people in some wealthy country are willing to change their daily transportation to bicycle due to its environmentally friendly and healthy for users. However, it is not a common transport for the citizen in underdeveloped and developing country. Thus, in my opinion, we need to create more campaign to encourage more people to engage in cycling.

To begin with, due to the significant growth in the number of engine vehicles such as car and motorbike, the qualitative of air is reduced and breathing in that air cause numerous health diseases. However, private vehicles still the most common transportation because of its convenience in long distance travelling. Moreover, weather condition is also a big obstacle that obstructs the decision of a person in the transportation transforming.

In my opinion, we can increase the popularity of cycling by creating more campaign that promotes to the citizen about its benefits. For instance, cycling help reduces the number of private cars which contributes to the reduction in the level of exhaust emissions released into the environment and slowing down the progress of global warming. However, a bicycle is not a convenient transport to travel in long distance. To solve that, the government should construct more public transports and encourage the citizen to use a bicycle as an intermediate transportation.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that cycling does bring many benefits. However, in some place, it still an uncommon transportation due to its inconvenience in long distance travelling. To overcome those obstacles, in my opinion, the government should spend more money on improving public transportation.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-14 Dongvo 73 view
2020-01-06 trunghn1 56 view
2020-01-06 trunghn1 61 view
2019-11-21 Arden Nguyen 73 view
2019-11-18 nhaothuy 73 view
Essays by user taho.ielts :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'common transport'.
Suggestion: common transport
...d healthy for users. However, it is not a common transport for the citizen in underdeveloped and d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'convenient transport'.
Suggestion: convenient transport
...obal warming. However, a bicycle is not a convenient transport to travel in long distance. To solve th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43181818182 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25676522686 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1406880475 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234571849515 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779403139828 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618586502961 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134754157363 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484540879724 0.056905535591 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.