The demand for food is increasing worldwide. Why has it happened? What measures could the international community take to improve the situation?
Lacking farming land is one of the primary causes of the skyrocketing demands for food in a global society. Therefore, improving bilateral policies regarding food could be a viable solution to tackle this issue.
Many believe the limited access to farmland is the leading cause of the increasing food demand globally, resulting in a scarcity of food staples in certain nations. This is because much land has been allocated to the business establishment buildings, increasing the scarcity of land for farming. For instance, Japan experienced a rice shortage in 2014 following the massive city restructuring in many prefectures. The construction abolished more than half of the total paddy fields in Japan during that moment, increasing the price by more than three times, given the rise in rice import happening during that time.
To solve the problem of the high demand for food, improving bilateral partnerships could be one of the feasible solutions since the price could be lowered through cooperation consensus. This results in lower food prices as there would be other things to substitute the exchange rather than money. For instance, Indonesia needed to import more than 98% of its soybean intake from Thailand since the demand kept rising in the last decade. As Thailand also depended strongly on Indonesia to supply them with coal, they regulated policy concerning price reduction for Soybean exports to Indonesia. Though the demands continue to jump, the reduced import fees prevented Indonesia’s economy from experiencing a downturn.
To conclude, although the scarcity of farming land results in the rise in food demand, having good bilateral cooperation among countries could be the ultimate solution to tackle that issue. If possible, maintaining good partnerships globally is necessary done by every nation.
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for the three countries between 2007 and 2010
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally crucial for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 11
- Some people think that the government should provide free education at every level However some say individuals should pay for their university education 78
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or Disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to supply them with coal, they regulated policy concerning price reduction for So...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42657342657 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79904659512 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3360871243 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.384615385 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211996924169 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759430909635 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508038253911 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133158660457 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373086050263 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.