In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is the fact that it is difficult for children in remote areas in some developing countries to approach educational systems. While some people believe that providing more schools and teacher is the long-term solution to tackle this problem, I would argue that assisting students in rural places broaden their knowledge through using computers and the Internet should be given to priority.
On the one hand, there is not any difficulty to understand why the role of schools and teachers is highly acclaimed. One reason is that there is a lack of facilities to meet the demands of using schools to teach and learn. If some remote communities build more schools for children, this will encourage more young people to go to schools. Furthermore, building better infrastructure will help teachers in rural communities having the convenient environment for the transmission of knowledge which allows students to be received a huge opportunity to go to schools as well as have a great source to access a world of knowledge.
On the other hand, I believe that distance learning is the most appropriate method to help students have more chances to acquire knowledge. In remote areas, the local children must help their parents make ends meet rather than spend all day learning in the school. There is evidence to support the idea that providing computers and the Internet that help children in studying whenever they have spare times is more beneficial. Another reason is that building more educational structures for children in developing countries costs a great deal of money. The shortage of financial assistance can cause interrupting students with learning.
In conclusion, schools and technology play an equally important role in rural and remote education because both have their own values. It seems to me that it is better to help people can study through the Internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | nguyen thuy an2309 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Dongvo | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | ali_mohammadi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Legendmaker | 100 | view |
- Whether or not someone achievies their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 56
- Everyone should become Vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 58
- The graph below compare changes in the birth rates of China and the US between 1920 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14705882353 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77507942758 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1862002308 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.153846154 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299724111389 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094414760157 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624028719098 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177548293954 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05742946553 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.