Directors and managers of organisations are often older people. Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past years, there has been an exponential rise in the number of younger leaders in many establishments. An increasing number of experts have claimed that older people as leaders might not be capable enough to compete with their counterparts. This essay agrees partially with the above notion and the points will be discussed in the upcoming paragraph.
Younger leaders are much more up to date in terms of technology and in touch with the modern world through the usage of the internet. Moreover, they are considerably more open to learning new skills than their complements. Secondly, due to their young age, they are ready to work round the clock, which inspires and encourages others to become workaholics, which means higher productivity level during the day leading to overall better performance. All this might allow them to make wiser decisions and bring success to the organization they work for.
On the other hand, old leaders have a lot of real-life experience and deep knowledge regarding their respective jobs, all this make their strategic perspective stronger. Last but not the least, older people are often respected by others. Thus, they can raise their voice on issues and mostly everyone could listen to them.
To recapitulate, considering the aforementioned points, while I accept the fact that we had leaders as older people for decades, but we should not consider only a single factor while hiring for senior positions.
- Universal basic income advantages and disadvantages 56
- Directors and managers of organisations are often older people Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- why do people prefer supermarkets over local shops 61
- Increasing petrol price is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems 89
- Many people believe that social networking gives a negative impact on individual and society 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16877637131 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7368000651 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658227848101 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1366789999 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.363636364 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192885370541 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709366663765 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731861972606 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112610946771 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461455364967 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.