Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television.
There are two ways of enjoying an event, either attending the live performance or watching the same event on television. I cannot wholly agree with the statement that watching live is more enjoyable than watching it on TV. In fact, it depends on the type of event that you are going to attend.
For shows like a music concert or a drama, attending live performance has its advantages. The real-time experience will create a good mood, which makes it more enjoyable. The crowd reaction will help in the enhancement of the vibes you receive by the exchange of similar interests between the audience. Better audibility of the performance due to the sound system in the theater is a plus point. In decoding the event, the clarity of sound may lose.
However, for sports events, I prefer to watch on television. I cannot deny the fact that a cheerful crowd will boost the watching experience; still, one may not be able to witness every significant moment of the match from the gallery. On the other hand, if you choose the telecast on television, you don’t need to worry about missing anything, as there will be a replay of all the game-changing moments. If you are in the gallery, you will have a view from only one angle, whereas in television the match will be showed from various angles using different cameras that too in close shots and long shots.
To conclude, experiencing live performance and watching the television telecast has its own advantages and disadvantages. Hence, we cannot say that one is better than the other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | Sreeveni Das | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-15 | Singh-saab | 56 | view |
| 2014-04-25 | galuhprestisa | 70 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major University in 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or a modern apartment? 56
- if you are given an opportunity to study a subject which you have never studied, which subject will you choose? 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. 56
- The diagram below shows how a solar powered water pump works. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, still, whereas, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83396226415 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71911865603 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3032863609 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365649035511 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125188363062 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117461871235 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225752391913 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181707309317 0.056905535591 319% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.