Do you agree or disagree that improvements in technology reduce the role of Olympic Games?
In recent years, the industrial revolution 4.0 has been changing our lives rapidly and thanks to the development of the high tech, our daily lives has become more and more convenient. Many products of 4.0 revolution is applied as an assistant in sporty events, especially in Olympic Games. Some people assume that this improvement in technology reduce the role of Olympic Games but I personally disagree with this statement.
In my point of view, technology just help the game to become fairer and more accurate in competitions. First, thanks to the development of technology, we can know who cross the finish line first or the specific time of athletes’ performance in some difficult cases like there are two competitors cross the line simultaneously in swimming or sprint races. Second, you can use technology to measure the result when competitors finish their performances in long jump, javelin throwing, shot putter, etc. That makes results more accurate as well as precise and the winner is more deserved with his or her performance. Thirdly, thanks to the high-tech testing machine, judges are able to know competitors who used doping to boost their strength in the contest. Last but not least, I would like to mention that FIFA decided to use the VAR (Video Assistant Video) system in World Cup which was hosted by Russia in 2018. This technology was very useful in every match and because of this system, many problems were solved clearly such as France defeated Australia thanks to VAR, Peru gained the penalty kick after using this technology, Korean football team lost Sweden thanks to this high-tech, etc. Besides, the technology also makes the games less interesting and more boring. The reason is when this kind of technology is used, there are either no more argument between contestants or the result is depended on the referee’s judge.
In a nut shell, the improvements in technology is not reduce the role of the sporty event, especially Olympics Games. It has become a useful assistant for the referee in the games and bring the fair play to every match.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | vishal sachdeva | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-07 | BINDRI | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | suraj1471998 | 72 | view |
| 2019-01-18 | Selfstudy | 62 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
- The charts below show the average wages of managerial and general staff and the profits of the company TRN between 2000 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 39
- Do you agree or disagree that improvements in technology reduce the role of Olympic Games 62
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
..., the improvements in technology is not reduce the role of the sporty event, especiall...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and bring the fair play to every match.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, third, thirdly, well, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03170028818 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7230455901 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567723342939 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9420709853 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201783437821 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826013364653 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114640147049 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186098905566 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782549843503 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.