Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitor for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent, do you agree or disagree
The dramatic increase in transnational travel in recent years has sparked controversy which caused a situation where international travelers are charged higher than the locals for cultural and historical monuments. This notion should be rejected as one can see many facts in favor of this development.
Historical attractions are existed since thousands of years, and these monuments need some sort of preservation and special care to keep it in a good condition to last long. Continues visiting by people at the historical places along with severe environment conditions may destroy the precious structure; therefore, money should be arranged to fund the preservation process. For example, government impose different price to the foreign visitors to secure the required budget required for any maintenance or repairs for such important heritage.
The reason why international visitors should be treated equally is rooted in the fact that both visitors and locals are economically motivated. International travel opens opportunities for business development throughout the world. Entrepreneurs are interested not only in the domestic market but also in the oversea market. Paying the same fee as the natives when entering any historical locations may leave them a good impression. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to sight places like Windsor Castle, Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these vital buildings.
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitor for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 56
- For schoolchildren, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 78
- In many countries today, people buy a range of household goods (television, microwave, oven and rice cookers). Is it a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, as to, for example, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56390977444 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04867516492 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4172396818 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219775722921 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06676933268 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578410504783 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139482342064 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145271946922 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.