Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels. Is this a positive or negative development?

The significance of energy which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. However, nowadays fossil fuels are the major part of power in across the world while a few numbers of countries provide some origins of energy as replacement of fossil fuels. In my opinion, this is a productive improvement because it will reduce pollution from environment. This essay will explain attributing to this this trend along with examples in the looming paragraphs.

To begin with, at present the using of petrol, dissel as fuels are increasing day by day and individuals are suffering from various drawbacks for pollution such as asthema, heart attack, mental disorder. Moreover, if the uses of fuels decrease rapidly, pollution will reduce from cities through creating alternative energy. To take an example, nuclear power plant can play a great role as the changes of fossil fuels by acquiring electricity among the city areas as well as country sides. For instance, Bangladesh government has provided a nuclear power plant at Ruppur in Bangladesh to remove pollutions along with the shortage of electricity which is a great creation of Bangladesh. Hence, it is clear that creating new power plant can stop using of fossil fuels.

On the other hand, Biomass also a as energy which is made by natural materials such as wood, grass, organic waste from households and industries and it is completely safe from making environmental pollutions. For example, most of individuals from village in Bangladesh and India are occupying biomass to receive energy which contribute reasonable price. Thus, everyone should be concerned about energy sources to stop pollution.

To sum up, according to the arguments one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of energy are instrumental indeed. However, all governments should be provided new power plant as the replacement of fossil fuels to prevent environmental pollution.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-17 dhbtran 67 view
2023-06-17 dhbtran 67 view
2023-06-09 trần ngọc tuấn 89 view
2023-06-05 nijam 78 view
Essays by user nijam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
... This essay will explain attributing to this this trend along with examples in the loomin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...els. On the other hand, Biomass also a as energy which is made by natural mate...
^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the individuals') or simply say ''most individuals''.
Suggestion: most of the individuals; most individuals
... environmental pollutions. For example, most of individuals from village in Bangladesh and India ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3164556962 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86985364196 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560126582278 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9845724579 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273847942647 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907399560567 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749655763773 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156640375286 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509706567128 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.