Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels.
Is this a positive or negative development?
For the majority of the world, fossil fuels are widely used as the major resources for energy production, while other renewable resources are becoming the main focus of energy replacement in a few nations. From my point of view, this is a positive switch, offering a great benefit for the global economy and an ideal approach to tackling environmental issues.
The first noticeable positivity when shifting to sustainable resources is that the flow of the economy is globally well-maintained. In order to meet the high demand for electrical household utilities, most of the electricity generation comes from the excessive exploitation of coal, resulting in a shortage of natural sources. This leads to a tremendous price increase in various types of electric usage, creating financial chaos as the cost outweighs the average income. However, there are no such cases of price adjustment when solar and wind power are put to use as the main source of energy creation, and the worldwide economy is set back to be balanced because they are extremely abundant in the atmosphere, ready for over several millennia of exploitation.
Further, this transition for regenerated-source integration acts as a solid shield, combating the dilemmic environmental deterioration. Conventional energy utilization, such as coal, can be a contributory factor to air pollution and respiratory health issues because millions of tons of detrimental gases are emitted into the atmosphere. When coal is burned, it produces various types of pollutants in the air, such as CO2 and nitrogen, which can have serious physical effects such as dizziness, headaches, and breathing difficulties if an individual inhales them accidentally. Shifting to renewable energy can improve air quality and mitigate harmful emissions due to the fact that it is a fresher and more environmentally friendly alternative, thereby protecting human health and the environment.
In conclusion, the attitude towards the shift to renewable sources is a positive step. It is not only a fundamental element for the global economy, managing stability and striking growth, but also an optimal solution for environmental hazards, reducing pollution, and fostering human health.
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people decide to start their n business instead of working for a company or organization Do the advantages for people working for their own business outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a complusory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to youngger children 56
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...er renewable resources are becoming the main focus of energy replacement in a few nations....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49707602339 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22239203127 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3533816485 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183779972279 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618817879017 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703356033615 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108930246236 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698187402449 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...er renewable resources are becoming the main focus of energy replacement in a few nations....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49707602339 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22239203127 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3533816485 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183779972279 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618817879017 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703356033615 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108930246236 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698187402449 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.