In the future, it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries. Is this positive or negative development?
There is a prediction that we will take on a large proportion of senior citizens in the near future. It has been a bone of contention for many. Others argue that older people are unwise, while others consider the advantages. From my perspective. I will show both sides of that opinion in this essay.
On the positive side, an increase in the number of old people is more significant. Firstly, they play a crucial role in participating in charity work to instill a great sense of responsibility and altruism in the younger generation. Furthermore, they have more experience than young people, so they can advise both economically and politically.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that they have a longer life expectancy than before. This means that youngsters must shoulder much more responsibility for caring for older people. As a result, excessive pressure may be put on youth, hindering their economy development. Moreover, the government needs to pay for increased retirement pensions and health care costs for them, so both society and the family bear a greater financial burden and are forced to work overtime in order to get a higher salary. For example, the development of a country whose proportion of senior citizens is higher than that of young people, such as Japan, is already facing a serious elderly problem.
In conclusion, society needs to pay more taxes to the elderly, since they may contribute to developing and humanizing the country.
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 67
- Many people use social media every day to keep in touch with friends and get social news Do you think the advantages of it outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 56
- The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04526748971 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90946793092 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609053497942 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7290436175 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5714285714 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185969360362 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544533215535 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459301109191 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933435433689 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540994100321 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.