In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often claimed that in the future, the internet and free cyber platforms will replace prints in people’s reading habits. This essay totally agrees with this view owing to the following reasons.
One of the main reasons is that the internet and cutting-edge devices make digital books and newspapers much more at hand. To explain, thanks to state-of-the-art technology, people now can access online material with just a gadget no matter where they are, which seems effortless and handy. To illustrate, in Vietnam, most people use Kindle or other platforms such as Books by Apple to read instead of traditional materials. This is because they not only offer a huge source of ebooks and online materials, which are available and accessible on the cloud but they are also portable. Another reason is that it can be a solution to mitigate deforestation. In other words, making a number of books demanded in the future requires a hefty amount of wood, which directly leads to deforestation. One way to alleviate this issue is to encourage people to use cyber books and newspapers so that the number of trees cut down to produce paper may be reduced. Brazil is a prime example whose authorities have several policies to encourage residents to use ebooks, which results in the 10% rehabilitation of Amazon forest due to low demand. Hence, online books and newspapers will change people’s reading tendencies in the future.
Despite that, others still believe that using digital appliances makes them distracted. They often complain about their reading being interrupted because of what is happening on social media. To this, people should blame themselves for lacking self-discipline instead of accusing tools for disturbing them. Moreover, nowadays advanced devices are integrated with new features that help maintain user's concentration. Obviously, it is ill founded to state that.
In conclusion, I totally support the idea that in the future, people will switch to ebooks and online newspapers because it is not only handy but also ideal to mitigate deforestation. Furthermore, this will not necessarily interrupt the user's reading process as many people are concerned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-26 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities What are the causes Suggest some measures to reduce traffic jams in big cities 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, may, moreover, so, still, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26074498567 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8646704113 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587392550143 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2275916771 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266939585098 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790192859186 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623857574077 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159104297912 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362983302131 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.