Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. What
extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the modern day, the controversy of investing state’s budget on railways or road constructions has raised a great deal of public attention. Although the latter can have many downsides, the former may bring about a wide range of advantages.
On the one hand, widening the roads does more harm than good. Firstly, it is attributable to the complicated road network in urban areas, especially such numerous mega cities as HCM and HN, a significant amount of time upgrading road systems is unavoidable. As a result, either anxiety disorder or noise disturbance which render at the same time lead to a reduction in residents’ living-conditions. Secondly, the modernization of highway network may act as a stimulation to boost the number of used private cars. Therefore, the more personal transport operating on the streets, the more exhausting fumes releasing into human habitat, this is conductive to an increase in air contamination.
On the other hand, the major investment spends on railways which seems to be a well-rounded measure to combat several currently issues. In fact, the majority of city-dwellers are able to make use of subways to go to works or schools on daily basics due to excessive capacity of its. This permanent methods would not only satisfy commuters’ traveling demands but also deal with community problems, including congestion and street accidents. In addition, the speed of the subways is much faster than other vehicles and that cutting down the number of hours for transportation. Therefore, people are more likely have an amount of spare time to stay focus on their family and hobbies with the most comfortable psychology.
In conclusion, encouraging urban citizens using such public transport as railways is a feasible measure to solve the social problems in various sectors. It would be beneficial and convenient than other solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 93
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 89
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to individuals and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree and disagree 84
- Encouraging people to use public transport is the best way to solve traffic problems in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25666666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09468899891 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1555610143 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.642857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149962848674 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454359627375 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375854366227 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774100329734 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275952944674 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.