Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In modern days, people have different opinions about whether governments should prioritize the action of satisfy their citizens’ need rather than ensure the safety of wild species. Although the enhancement of living conditions is necessary, from my point of view, I concur that the protection of wild animals should be high on the agenda.
There is a wide range of reasons which presents the importance of the protection of wild animals. First, there is a fact that wildlife extinction results in an ecological crisis, which directly affects the human survival. For example, the amount of numerous marine species are gradually depleted due to excessive practice and this may render negative effects on food resources, especially, fish stocks and seafood. Second, in terms of the law of nature, there is a link between fauna and flora as well as a loss of species which can disrupt the balance of the ecosystem. As a result, by ensuring the survival of various animals at the brink of extinction, the density of fauna such as tropical forests may be extended, which may help to handle the phenomenon of climate change.
On the other hand, by ensuring either the diversity of the wildlife or the original forests, humans can not only create a coexistent environment without any competition but also generate profits from natural resources. This is because ecotourism in remote areas with diverse kinds of vegetation and animal kingdom, which may act as new a kind of traveling to benefit the well-being of the local community due to tons of occupations, especially humans and nature may live together in perfect harmony. More importantly, there is no doubt that the medical industry undergoes a rapid growth thanks to the contribution ranging from plants to species. For example, penicillin which could be found in the mushrooms by chance in the nineteenth century was a tremendous remedy and this medicine used to save countless lives.
In conclusion, in the long run benefits, I personally disagree with this statement. It is obvious that governments and citizens have to protect wildlife.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- Encouraging people to use public transport is the best way to solve traffic problems in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations 89
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is negative or positive development 89
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernments should prioritize the action of satisfy their citizens’ need rather than...
^^
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a and flora as well as a loss of species which can disrupt the balance of the eco...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13742690058 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80402648878 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616959064327 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3721782904 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.153846154 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164562793849 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538521918393 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380946206673 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101199230772 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187863540249 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.