High school students are usually not good at managing money. What are the reasons? What are the solutions?
Money management is one of the most indispensable skills that all of us should acquire. However, it seems that high school students these days are not yet to carefully control their budget. This can be rooted from a number of reasons going to be examined in the following essay to find out some effective measures to help improve this issue.
Poor students’ control over the money they have can be put down to two important causes. Firstly, it is because of their being rebellious and innocent by age that has dug a hole in their pocket. Since adolescents often aspire to prove themselves as independent, they tend to avoid listening to their parents’ advice, which is meant to prepare them with fundamental knowledge to deal with the outside world. Thus, these students, still being ignorant, are more likely to be ripped off to drain their money out. Another culprit behind high school learners’ spending uncontrollably is the urges from the mass media. Undoubtedly, in this era of advanced technology and communication, individuals can easily catch sight of hundreds of advertisements varying from pop-ups, billboards or TVC. However, not all of them are able to bring us benefits. In fact, most ads try to encourage consumption in all age groups, especially the young who are often seen as being credulous and impressionable.
To answer the question raised by this problem among adolescents, the responsibility falls on both every parent and school to educate children about basic money managing skills from an early age. Children should be taught how to make the most of their pocket money instead of going through it in just a few days. And once they can learn this, adolescents might adapt much better to the ever-evolving world today. At the same time, more stringent regulations on advertisements should be enforced by the government to prevent inappropriate content from stimulating youngsters into conspicuous consumption.
To sum up, although it can be difficult to tell a high school student what to do with his money, some ways starting with the root causes can be implemented by not only parents or schools but also the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-30 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | giangngoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- High school students are usually not good at managing money What are the reasons What are the solutions 89
- The gap between the rich and the poor is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 89
- Some believe that it is good for a country s culture to import films and TV programmes while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some believe that it is good for a country s culture to import films and TV programmes while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, thus, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07865168539 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91328294593 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620786516854 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7766614049 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165230442898 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500644405936 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556059358652 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117280001216 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534440082187 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.