Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is true that mobile transportations, such as cars, motorbikes have led to traffic congestions, as well as serious effects on environment. I agree with those who believe a solution of making the price of consumed energies like petrol higher, but it will be better when some more solutions related to prices in different areas to reduce the trend.
Firstly, it is precise that to increase the costs of petrol will decrease a number of demands in using own transport. For example, most of citizens prefer to utilize public transportations rather than their own cars due to high fees of driving in long distances. Moreover, this trend will provide many advantages for the nature. The less consumptions of vehicles will reduce a vast number of air pollution, such as carbon dioxide released to the environment.
Other than that, besides the reasonable idea, governments and local authorities can have some actions to encourage their civilizations to use public transports. For instance, they might come up with discounted fees of public transportations, such as trains, ferries and light rails, in the peak time, which is the main reason of traffic jams. Additionally, the local authorities can set up a system of parking prices in urban areas being much higher than country sides. Hence, it will lead to enforcing drivers making more commitments with public transitions.
In conclusion, the traffic jams and air pollution from that are significantly concerned issues in all countries. Thus, fortunately, some measurements are conducted to prevent this situation, being to concentrate on price relations like petrol, moreover, public transportations and parking lots.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development? 78
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement- making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the citizens') or simply say ''most citizens''.
Suggestion: most of the citizens; most citizens
...ds in using own transport. For example, most of citizens prefer to utilize public transportation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun consumptions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ide many advantages for the nature. The less consumptions of vehicles will reduce a ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32954545455 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08181361923 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7867209522 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108573476567 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372520462402 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031960076462 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712405131565 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365915947241 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.