Traffic congestion and pollution are ever increasing problems in the world. Some people believe that the most effective method to resolve these is to increase the cost of petrol. In my opinion, I mostly agree however, there are other factors that play important roles as well.
To embark with, with the rise in the price of fuel , its demand will definitely fall and the use of vehicles will be limited to important works only as they will be aware of their need to pay more for it. As it is, the price of everything is getting expensive everyday, they will not have more to spare for petrol either. This will help reduce the congestion and if the number of automobiles running are reduced then pollution will decrease simultaneously.
Despite the inclination in the cost of fuel, traffic has reduced to some extent but not entirely. In order to prevent traffic jams, the government should encourage people to use public transportation. Not only should they encourage, but should also provide with better facilities in terms of public transport. The government should opt for renewable sources of energy such as solar, wind and hydropower to run vehicles and factories which will subsequently decline pollution. Most importantly, it is self awareness without which, no matter how expensive the fuel is or the effect of pollution has over the world, one will not do anything about it.
In conclusion , although increase in the cost of petrol has resolved traffic and pollution to a great amount however supplemental factors such as the government, people and self awareness amongst them significantly contribute to the reduction of problems.
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 an the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...with, with the rise in the price of fuel , its demand will definitely fall and the...
^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...rice of everything is getting expensive everyday, they will not have more to spare for p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t do anything about it. In conclusion , although increase in the cost of petrol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08118081181 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80109868554 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571955719557 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9174167975 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141081508624 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547479748297 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366450946975 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922053290801 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335074705154 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.