Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People think that it is more difficult for a single person to make changes that can improve the environment. They also argue these changes need a high level effort that has to be done for instance by governments and private big holdings.
I think that an individual behavior can affect on the environment changes. Recycling is an example of people behavior with massive consequences on our planets. Nowadays there are wide area or entire nation used as waste from other nations, for instance Philippines have a vast area where plastic waste coming from US are stocked there with a consequent impact on that area air and field contamination. As per waste recycle also the waste of food has environment and social impact. Surveys show that millions of people could be fed only with wasted food. Another personal behavior that affect environment change is using of public transport. Big cities are an example of how air pollution produced by city traffic gem can influence the air quality and the rate tumor in small animals.
On the other side governments and big holdings efforts is important as well. Governments should either stimulate people in using public transport and promote more performant transports development. Also the building new green space in the cities change the way of living environment in the city and grow the awareness and the respect of environment among people. Holdings can also promote campaign for the a good environment for instance replacing plastic bag with starch one or replacing plastic glass with refilling aluminium bottle.
We can conclude that neither individual nor governments efforts are enough if they are not integrated in our society culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | dknk | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Bakhtiyar1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | cathylearnsrock | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Chinkiarora | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | winiston | 67 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.Summar 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...I think that an individual behavior can affect on the environment changes. Recycling is a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...more performant transports development. Also the building new green space in the cit...
^^^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
... Holdings can also promote campaign for the a good environment for instance replacing...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, as to, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15579710145 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70477263389 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7232407319 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11308502319 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462814582294 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05537009537 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885740640514 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383510836669 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.