Instead of requiring primary school students to do experiments themselves, schools should only allow them to watch experiments demonstrated by teachers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that primary school students should be prohibited from directly conducting experiments as observing teachers’ demonstration would be sufficient. Personally, I strongly agree with the idea as elementary school students lack the necessary experiences and skills to handle some types of experiments.
On the one hand, primary school students should not be allowed to carrying out the experiments as they lack the fundamental characteristics for direct participation. Specifically, primary students are too young to comprehend the danger of mismanagement. Therefore, errors may happen during the experiments’ process, being detrimental to the students’ safety and negatively affecting the quality of teaching. Consequently, it is not optimal for students to perform experiments as safety and security are not guaranteed.
On the other hand, pure observation would be suitable for primary students because some experiments can be too complicated for them to execute. In fact, young students are easily attracted to novelty. Therefore, the long guidelines that are fundamental to conduct experiments would make them feel bored and not be able to follow, directly affecting the experiments’ procedures. This will in turn harness the studying pace and the quality of teaching. As a result, students should only be allowed to watch the demonstrations of experiments.
To conclude, despite controversial schools of thought on determining the best approach to teach students experiments, I endorse the hypothesis that primary school students should not be permitted to personally participate in them as they lack the rudimentary knowledge, characteristics, and skills to execute experiments successfully.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-15 | @hoangnguyen | 61 | view |
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 78
- It is more important for governments to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think this is good for the world of sports while others think there are disadvantages of this Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Governments in major cities around the world spend enormous expenditure for restoration of old buildings This money should be used for providing new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, so, therefore, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.908 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46361429723 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0191937971 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.083333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32563700081 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132382404952 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767516333381 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225828349533 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243337367245 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.