Intelligent machines such as robots are widely applied to take the place of human beings. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
It is widely true that robotic machines have been substituting humans in some industries in recent years. This tendency brings both beneficial and detrimental impacts, which will be discussed as follows.
Obviously, intelligent machines liberate human workforce. First, productivity in doing repetitive and physically demanding jobs is significantly improved by applying robotic or automatic systems. Also, they alter workers to conduct highly dangerous tasks like investigating unknown seabeds, working in radioactive environments and exploring space. Second, intelligent systems allow remote monitoring and control, meaning that less manual labors are required and teleworking could be applied. Third, some highly precise tasks can only be smoothly carried out with support from robots. Robot-assisted brain surgeries in some highly complicated cases epitomize this idea.
However, some looming consequences are brought about by the replacement of intelligent machines for human roles. The first apparent one is unemployment. These days, the growing presence of robots in factories gradually take over human jobs. After a short period of system testing, wherever robotic systems are deployed, they basically replace humans there. It is also worth noting that social unrest and some relevant issues like committing suicide and crime can boom when the unemployment rate rises to a certain level. The second impact is the rising pressures on employees. They have to not only strive for being more productive but also undergo extra intensive training to either co-work with or operate newly installed advanced systems at the workplace; otherwise, they become jobless. Those strains eventually cause physical and mental fatigue.
To sum up, while intelligent machines offer us numerous benefits in terms of productivity improvement, they result in an increasingly competitive labor market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | daniel luke | 89 | view |
- To what extent are people in your country interested in vegetarianism? Why? 89
- Should we ban plastic bags? 89
- Intelligent machines such as robots are widely applied to take the place of human beings. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 89
- It is more important for schoolchildren to study local history than international history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbing. What factors contribute to job satisfation? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91272727273 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88121645568 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.730909090909 0.561755894193 130% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1028045223 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6470588235 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196343722957 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061021812237 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689267373275 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11636019089 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351805521111 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.7 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.15 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.