International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
It is acknowledged that many tourist attractions have been granted a large number of rewarding perks in term of international tourism; however, an adverse impact has simultaneously influenced both the locals and their surroundings, which is quite inferior to overseas traveling’s upside.
A first glance at its noticeable merits, the first and most outstanding benefit is that tourism plays a pivotal role as one of the most profit-making industries in boosting a nation’s economy. For instance, the more sightseers visit, the highest the consumption in domestic goods is. Even more, employment prospects are wide open for residents living at these tourist spots, especially in regard to hospitality major. Another bonus is that when an economy is on its way becoming prosperous, government inevitably gets more financially lucrative income from their citizens’ taxes in order to facilitate facilities’ enhancement and innovation.
Shifting focus on the downside, there is always a high outbreak possibility regarding to menaces of disastrous plague. Taking an epidemic provoked by mutated Ebola virus as an example, its infection speed accelerated exponentially in 2014, which resulted in thorough inspection activities and intricate red tape for immigrating and traveling at all Europe’s airports and border gates. In addition, there has been an act of vandalism on historical relics, ancient ruins, and many destinations owning to bad public awareness from a minority of visitors. Some tourists tend to carve their name on antiques with a meaning that they were there as well as drop litter everywhere they set foot on.
Worldwide travel is of paramount significance for economic growth by increasing the demand on consuming domestic goods, opening a huge number of vacancies for local dwellers, and upgrading infrastructure. On the other hand, it poses a great threat to people’ health by contagious illness and causes environmental pressure. In a nut shell, international tourism brings a wide extent of strength overpowering its weakness.
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school.Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. 100
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages? 100
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.Do you agree or disagree? 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y tourist attractions have been granted a large number of rewarding perks in term of internationa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66453674121 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32852766984 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680511182109 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4532561026 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.75 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145514650398 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473808679467 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562891196255 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09115891716 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416675757815 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.18 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.