Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Interviews has become increasingly popular method of choosing workers. Some people believe that the way to opt for salary earners is not the optimum strategy and there are more effective approaches. I mostly object to the point of view as the technique is not time-consuming and practical even though other methods have their advantages.
The first reason why I advocate to the use of inverviews is that it buys time for both workers and companies. A particular formal conversation between interviewers and interviewees may take under two hours, which saves a great deal of time and energy for both job seekers and recruiters. It appears that other techniques including phone screening may take less hours, but the approach is unable to clarify qualifications as well as reliability of applicants, especially those who are silver-tounged.
Additionally, face-to-face interactions de facto enables head hunters to learn about people looking for employment opportunities. Body language, choices of clothes, and even use of perfume would reflect personalities and trustworthiness of a person while being interviewed. The appearance of interview candidates thus provides a detailed insight for firms to assess whether they are suitable for companies’ culture and values.
Admittedly, there are alternatives for building companies’s workforce. One prime example is an entrance test, which can be harnessed to evaluate intelligence as well as EQ level of potential staff. While tests can be productive in amassing manual laborers, they may not work well in terms of dealing with high-profile workers in managerial roles, who are more sophisticated. In such case, the position of interviews is invaluable.
In summary, I somewhat disagree with the perspective that interviews are not qualified for selecting potential workers as the solution is time-saving, insightful, and manifests multi-faceted aspects about individuals. Albeit the utilization of other methods such as testing may be appropriate in certain situations, it is unable to replace interviews in selection of management positions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-16 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 73 | view |
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 84
- Companies use major sporting events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...ques including phone screening may take less hours, but the approach is unable to clarify ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ques including phone screening may take less hours, but the approach is unable to cl...
^^^^
Line 4, column 476, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ability of applicants, especially those who are silver-tounged. Additionally, face-to-...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64873417722 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35132857545 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8294304424 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229745841065 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752084663072 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561452959342 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124844477315 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063927782449 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.