It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preferred To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any

Essay topics:

It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preferred.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

These days, more and more people who over fifty need to find appropriate announced by relevant employers, which opt to younger employees because of their prospective ideas and continually development attitudes. In my opinion the old people can bring a lot of benefits for improvement of company's businesses and they can show the same results as a young rivals. This essay will discuss the both views.
Firstly, there are a lot of positive factors in favor of hiring the workers over 50, because of their valuable experience and problem solving skills. While the older people retire, they are complaining that they have plenty of time, so they do not waste their time and prefer to be needful and helpful. For instance, some developed countries establish social project and involve and motivate the government and private companies to hire the older people who is retired. These type of activities bring useful advantages for companies and retired people, so project representative authorities provide the survey between the companies and get their opinions about consequences. Major part of companiy's leaders noted that the valuable experience and high responsibility behaviors of over 50 workers, increase their income level.
As always there are some factors which should be considered by employers such as problems related with learning the new technology tools. Due to physical factors like a memory, vision main part of older people can get new information slowly and it should be harder part of this issue. Some company heads argue that they really appreciate the older people's contribution, however sometimes company waste the time when they provide them on-job trainings related with some technology improvements and updates, in other words it takes the plenty of time.
In conclusion perhaps the providing long term awareness trainings has negative influences such as delays, business losses on company developments, however the company loses very small, while it supports the social developments.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-09 Amal Azimov 78 view
2021-02-09 Amal Azimov 73 view
2021-02-09 Amal Azimov 90 view
2021-02-09 Amal Azimov 56 view
2021-02-09 Amal Azimov 73 view
Essays by user NigarM :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fifty need to find appropriate announced by relevant employers, which opt to youn...
^^
Line 2, column 775, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rience and high responsibility behaviors of over 50 workers, increase their incom...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, really, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3873015873 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75493373132 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1553834402 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.416666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0974796463117 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384902289222 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241732451924 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525851782249 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432718641964 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.