Technology is a helpful servant but a dangerous master. As technology is developing day by day, some heritage value tend to decrease. There are two schools of thought on whether technology innovation decreasing the cultural values or these two have seperate importance. I, however, tend to agree with the notion that we are about to loss the cultural values as we are focusing more on technology. In this essay, I will highlight my viewpoints and try to provide sound reasoning for my claims.
First and foremost, technical innovation is the key of success. In other words, if we cannot develop our technical skills, we may loss the battle of survival. Furthermore, as we are struggling with work-life balance, we do not have enough time to remember the traditional cultures. Instead of that, we are coping up with the emarging technology which is much beneficial for human existance in the future. For instance, years ago people used to send their messages through letters, which was treated like a traditional culture in many nations such as India, but due to this email era, we do not need to write letters anymore. Thus, the cultural values are declining day by day.
Secondly, individuals can develop their cognitive and innovative skills with the help of technology and this cannot be achieved by cultural morals. Despite of the great history behind the development of our nation, we are pushing ourselves forward with technical development. Moreover, the historical knowledge plays no role in order to the progressive development. For example, we all know that in 1970s India was the most affluent country in this world but what is the value of this historical knowledge in today's world because now India belongs in the top 100 nations in terms of the penury scale. Hence, historical values are incompatible in this era of netizen.
Finally, changes is the only constant. To be precise, the law of nature is changing everyday. So why we should carry the burden of a culture. Even though, todays technology provides bread and butter to individuals, it may has no value in tomorrow's world. Additionally, cultural tradition pull us down from any bold step. I would like to cite an example. In the past the dowry system was the cultural tradition of Indian marriage. But nowadays youngsters do not follow the foot steps of their's old generation. However, sometime it becomes difficult to break the tradition due to cultural barrier. Therefore, we should not follow the traditional values anymore.
To conclue, I would like to reiterate my viewpoints by saying that, cultural knowledge cannot help us to feed ourselves and hence it will be lost as we develope our technical world.
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 73
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why traveled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destination over the same period.Write a report for a 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970s
...elopment. For example, we all know that in 1970s India was the most affluent country in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... precise, the law of nature is changing everyday. So why we should carry the burden of a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 447.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02908277405 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79460164557 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545861297539 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7596612467 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2592592593 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85185185185 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27715755639 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702877051104 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546447928902 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158116884009 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035268327683 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.