It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, a myriad of endangered animals are on the verge of extinction, it, therefore, leads to numerous repercussions. Some people believe that this disappearance is inevitable and people do not have any reason to deal with this problem. I, personally, contradict this premise because a part of the rare animals’ extinction is human-induced.
To begin with, it is believed that endangered animals are more likely to no longer exist in the next few years, which is a natural process and humans are not responsible for meddling in the extinction. First of all, these are long-standing animals and some of them can not adapt to the sudden change of temperature. For instance, dinosaurs had a large number of individuals in the past when the eruptions occurred which lasted for thousands of years. Temperatures would have dropped, plants would have been unable to grow, and food would have become scarce. Owing to this drastic change, dinosaurs could not acclimate and found food sources immediately; they, therefore, became wiped out. Besides, it is conspicuous that humanity would not be able to stop these disappearances. Nevertheless, this was only true in the past, not now, inasmuch as endangered creatures may now be saved, even if only in small part, by humans.
On the other hand, rare animals are a treasure trove of various aspects in life and protecting them is human’s responsibility. Firstly, these animals do a favor for biological diversity with a wide range of types of animals which provide valuable medicinal herbs, maintain biological balance. Therefore, they should be protected and preserved. Additionally, pushing animals to the brink of extinction is also partly due to human impacts such as hunting and habitat degradation, so humans have a duty to safeguard these organisms. With modern technology, humans are able to crossbreed to remain the number of endangered animals such as do do, quokka. In the interim, people are about to protect the environment as well as prohibit hunting rare creatures.
To sum up, animals play a pivotal role in human’s life; as a result, organizations should collaborate to conserve and maintain their variety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- The two pictures show a typical japanese office and a typical american office Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 Write at least 150 words 11
- Some people think it is better for one single legal system throughout the world Others say countries should have their own law To what extent do you agree or disagree 64
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23170731707 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01736866861 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8773360713 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204519269715 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681458528923 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043788691576 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125575287412 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269765217795 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.